The style of building we do consists of beams and columns at its structural core. The ancient Romans, the same people who gave us arches, came up with the idea of using timbers as structural elements in construction. The first lattice truss bridges were built by the Romans using wood timbers with metal fasteners. Since then, the use of wood in structural construction has increased exponentially to the point where it is the primary structural material used in homes and other smaller buildings.
To ensure we speak the same language, a beam is a horizontal structural element, and a column or post is a vertical one. An entire structure can be built out of beams and columns, but it wouldn’t be beneficial, except perhaps as a giant jungle gym. Those beams and columns will support the weight, but they need floors and walls to hold the weight and transfer it to the beams and columns. They need walls to break the space into usable areas and protect it from inclement weather.
We don’t typically see these structural elements as they are hidden inside walls, floors, and ceilings unless they are intentionally left exposed as design elements. But in many cases, those beams and columns are hidden in another way, splitting them into floor joists and the 2”x 4”s used in building walls. Nevertheless, the same construction principles apply, as the overall combined profile of the structural elements provides the strength. Two 2”x 4”s aren’t quite as strong as a 4”x 4”, but they are close enough to work in many circumstances.
Wood Columns or Posts
Wood is most robust when the load is parallel to the long grain. That also happens to fit the way that wood grows and is cut. There’s no such thing as a 4”x 4” post with the grain running perpendicular to its length simply because trees don’t grow that way. When that post is on end, the weight is supported along the size of the long grain, which can help that load.
On the one hand, posts and columns are the same—vertical structural elements are used to support the weight. However, while all columns are posts, not all posts are columns. Columns are generally round and more decorative than posts, while posts are intended to support weight without providing any aesthetics to the overall structure.
Another way of looking at this is that posts are square or rectangular, while columns are round. Being round, columns are more substantial than square posts made of the same amount of material. This is because a circle has no corners to be weak points. Additionally, the circle places more material at a greater distance from the center than a square does.
How much weight that post can handle is dependent on four factors:
- The type of wood – Not all woods have the same density or grain structure; therefore, they don’t all support the same weight. For construction, we usually look at some conifers, like Douglas Fir, for which the characteristics are well known.
- Quality of the wood – We usually think of wood grading as affecting the appearance of a board, but those knotholes also affect the strength of the wood.
- The dimensions of the post’s cross-section – A larger cross-section will support more weight.
- The unbraced length of the post—Wood is flexible, and too much weight can cause it to flex, putting undue stress on the grain and leading to buckling. Bracing the post doesn’t add any additional strength to the post itself but can help prevent it from flexing, thereby allowing it to hold more weight safely. This becomes more important as longer posts are used.
Interestingly, the Uniform Building Code (UBC) does not provide specific load rating information for posts, but it does for beams and joists. This is probably because the UBC deals with minimums, and standard construction techniques cover those minimums. If it were to provide that information, it would probably define the minimum number of posts to be used in a particular-sized area. Dealing with the spans for posts and joists more than covers those minimums.
Most posts in home construction are either 4”x 4” or two 2”x 4” studs put together to make a 4”x 4”. However, there are some situations in the home building where larger posts might be used. Therefore, the table below also covers the maximum weight in pounds for 4”x 6” and 6”x 6”.
Species | Post Length | No. 1 Lumber | No. 2 Lumber | Stud |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4”x 4” | 4”x 6” | 6”x 6” | 4”x 4” | 4”x 6” | 6”x 6” | 4”x 4” | 4”x 6” | ||
Douglas Fir-Larch | 2’ | 20392 | 31356 | 30004 | 18384 | 28237 | 21027 | 10701 | 16233 |
4’ | 17342 | 29949 | 29194 | 15793 | 27036 | 20547 | 9830 | 15809 | |
6’ | 11788 | 26966 | 27586 | 10936 | 24504 | 19612 | 7942 | 14971 | |
8’ | 7484 | 22105 | 24841 | 7000 | 20326 | 18032 | 5638 | 13541 | |
10’ | 5004 | 16830 | 20989 | 4694 | 15635 | 15721 | 3934 | 11514 | |
12’ | 3548 | 12648 | 16902 | 3332 | 11815 | 13035 | 2840 | 9324 | |
14’ | 2636 | 9675 | 13421 | 2478 | 9062 | 10550 | 2130 | 7530 | |
Hem-Fir | 2’ | 18338 | 28213 | 25494 | 17578 | 27127 | 17276 | 10049 | 15266 |
4’ | 15523 | 26917 | 24770 | 14477 | 25713 | 16894 | 9127 | 14823 | |
6’ | 10465 | 24161 | 23323 | 9343 | 22667 | 16154 | 7155 | 13935 | |
8’ | 6620 | 19700 | 20849 | 5810 | 17935 | 14906 | 4946 | 12416 | |
10’ | 4422 | 14932 | 17436 | 3854 | 13290 | 13070 | 3413 | 10337 | |
12’ | 3133 | 11196 | 13922 | 2727 | 9853 | 10902 | 2452 | 8224 | |
14’ | 2328 | 8554 | 11000 | 2023 | 7487 | 8860 | 1834 | 6484 |
Please note that these numbers will vary with other species of wood. As it may be challenging to determine what species of construction-grade dimensional lumber purchased at the lumberyard is, prudence dictates that a lower weight rating should be assumed when the actual species is unknown. Also, remember that pressure-treated lumber may have considerably different numbers, often lower due to the damage to the wood caused by pressure treating.
Wood Beams
Determining the weight rating of wood beams is considerably more complex than determining that of columns. The prime difference between the two is that rather than the unbraced length of the post. We have to consider the span that the beam is covering between posts. The longer the span, the less weight the beam can support or the greater the cross-section of the beam required to support the required weight.
Wood beam requirements in the UBC aren’t based on the failure point of the wood but rather on how much deflection the weight causes in the wood. Deflection can lead to failure, but it makes a floor feel spongy when walking on it, a decidedly uncomfortable feeling. The maximum limitation allowed is calculated by dividing the span by 360, with a maximum allowable deflection of 20mm. It gets a bit more complicated than that in that the use affects what is required, with beams or joists that support floors being different from beams that support roofs.
The table below shows the maximum weight that various structural beams or joists can support based on their size, material grade, and span.
Grade | Nominal Size | 4’ | 6’ | 8’ | 10’ | 12’ | 14’ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Select Structural | 2x6 | 1169 | 624 | 352 | 226 | 136 | 85 |
2x8 | 1703 | 992 | 667 | 363 | 252 | 182 | |
2x10 | 2467 | 1361 | 846 | 541 | 376 | 276 | |
2x12 | 3471 | 1788 | 1137 | 723 | 505 | 371 | |
2x14 | 4849 | 2291 | 1420 | 909 | 631 | 464 | |
4x6 | 1210 | 733 | 412 | 263 | 159 | 100 | |
4x8 | 1761 | 1026 | 716 | 458 | 318 | 228 | |
4x10 | 2552 | 1407 | 971 | 689 | 489 | 351 | |
4x12 | 3590 | 1850 | 1246 | 939 | 649 | 477 | |
4x14 | 5015 | 2370 | 1551 | 1153 | 818 | 601 | |
6x6 | 1701 | 886 | 498 | 319 | 211 | 132 | |
6x8 | 2600 | 1505 | 926 | 593 | 439 | 322 | |
6x10 | 3748 | 2051 | 1412 | 1014 | 705 | 518 | |
No. 1 | 2x6 | 942 | 419 | 235 | 151 | 105 | 76 |
2x8 | 1509 | 672 | 378 | 242 | 168 | 123 | |
2x10 | 2259 | 1002 | 564 | 361 | 251 | 184 | |
2x12 | 3032 | 1348 | 758 | 465 | 336 | 248 | |
2x14 | 3786 | 1682 | 946 | 606 | 421 | 309 | |
4x6 | 1098 | 488 | 275 | 178 | 122 | 90 | |
4x8 | 1761 | 549 | 477 | 308 | 212 | 156 | |
4x10 | 2552 | 1275 | 717 | 459 | 319 | 234 | |
4x12 | 3590 | 1730 | 973 | 623 | 432 | 318 | |
4x14 | 4907 | 2181 | 1227 | 785 | 545 | 401 | |
6x6 | 1594 | 708 | 3399 | 255 | 177 | 130 | |
6x8 | 2600 | 1318 | 741 | 474 | 329 | 242 | |
6x10 | 3748 | 2051 | 1338 | 856 | 595 | 437 | |
No. 2 | 2x6 | 848 | 377 | 212 | 135 | 94 | 69 |
2x8 | 1360 | 604 | 340 | 218 | 151 | 111 | |
2x10 | 2259 | 1002 | 564 | 361 | 251 | 184 | |
2x12 | 3032 | 1348 | 758 | 485 | 336 | 248 | |
2x14 | 3786 | 1682 | 946 | 606 | 421 | 309 | |
4x6 | 990 | 440 | 247 | 156 | 110 | 81 | |
4x8 | 1719 | 764 | 430 | 275 | 191 | 140 | |
4x10 | 2583 | 1148 | 646 | 413 | 287 | 211 | |
4x12 | 3502 | 1557 | 876 | 560 | 389 | 296 | |
4x14 | 4416 | 1967 | 1104 | 707 | 491 | 361 | |
6x6 | 930 | 413 | 233 | 149 | 103 | 75 | |
6x8 | 1729 | 768 | 423 | 277 | 192 | 141 | |
6x10 | 3469 | 1542 | 867 | 564 | 385 | 283 |
Grade | Nominal Size | 4’ | 6’ | 8’ | 10’ | 12’ | 14’ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Select Structural | 2x6 | 923 | 560 | 330 | 197 | 115 | 72 |
2x8 | 1345 | 783 | 529 | 338 | 235 | 165 | |
2x10 | 1948 | 1074 | 741 | 502 | 351 | 258 | |
2x12 | 2741 | 1412 | 951 | 679 | 471 | 347 | |
4x6 | 955 | 579 | 385 | 231 | 133 | 84 | |
4x8 | 1391 | 810 | 571 | 427 | 297 | 192 | |
4x10 | 2015 | 1111 | 767 | 586 | 446 | 299 | |
4x12 | 2834 | 1460 | 983 | 741 | 595 | 445 | |
No. 1 | 2x6 | 923 | 408 | 230 | 147 | 102 | 67 |
2x8 | 1345 | 655 | 368 | 236 | 164 | 120 | |
2x10 | 1948 | 977 | 550 | 352 | 245 | 180 | |
2x12 | 2741 | 1314 | 739 | 473 | 328 | 241 | |
4x6 | 955 | 476 | 268 | 172 | 118 | 79 | |
4x8 | 1391 | 810 | 466 | 298 | 207 | 152 | |
4x10 | 2015 | 1111 | 700 | 448 | 311 | 228 | |
4x12 | 2834 | 1460 | 949 | 607 | 422 | 310 | |
No. 2 | 2x6 | 848 | 377 | 212 | 135 | 94 | 69 |
2x8 | 1360 | 604 | 340 | 218 | 151 | 111 | |
2x10 | 2029 | 902 | 507 | 325 | 225 | 166 | |
2x12 | 2729 | 1213 | 682 | 437 | 303 | 223 | |
4x6 | 934 | 415 | 234 | 150 | 104 | 68 | |
4x8 | 1391 | 722 | 406 | 260 | 180 | 68 | |
4x10 | 2015 | 1064 | 610 | 390 | 271 | 199 | |
4x12 | 2834 | 1460 | 827 | 529 | 368 | 270 |
This, however, does not answer the question of what size joists need to be used, according to the UBC, for the construction of a home. That depends largely upon how those joists are going to be used. The table below provides maximum spans, according to the UBC, for double 2” Douglas fir-Larch or better dimensional lumber joists and rafters.
Nominal Lumber Size | Spacing O.C. | Floor Joists | Ceiling | Rafter-Ceiling Joist Combination with Drywall Below | Rafters |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
With Drywall Below | Light Roof | Tile Roof | Light Roof | Tile Roof | |||
2x4 | 12 | 6’-9” | 12’-5” | 9’-6” | 8’-2” | 10’-10” | 9’-10” |
16 | 6’-2” | 11’-3” | 8’-8” | 7’-5” | 9’-10” | 8’-6” | |
24 | 5’-4” | 9’-10” | 7’-4” | 6’-5” | 8’ | 6’-11” | |
2x6 | 12 | 10’-8” | 19’-6” | 15’-1” | 12’-11” | 16’-7” | 14’-4” |
16 | 9’-8” | 17’-8” | 13’-3” | 11’-8” | 14’-4” | 12’-5” | |
24 | 8’-1” | 14’-10” | 10’-10” | 9’-6” | 11’-9” | 10’-2” | |
2x8 | 12 | 14’-1” | 25’-8” | 19’-6” | 17’-2” | 21’ | 18’-2” |
16 | 12’-7” | 23’ | 16’-10” | 14’-10” | 18’-2” | 15’-9” | |
24 | 10’-3” | 18’-9” | 13’-9” | 12’-1” | 14’-10” | 12’-10” | |
2x10 | 12 | 17’-9” | >26’ | 23’-10” | 21’ | 25’-8” | 22’-3” |
16 | 15’-4” | >26’ | 20’-8” | 18’-2” | 22’-3” | 19’-3” | |
24 | 12’-6” | 22’-11” | 16’-10” | 14’-10” | 18’-2” | 15’-8” | |
2x12 | 12 | 20’-7” | >26’ | >26’ | 24’-5” | >26’ | 25’-9” |
16 | 17’-10” | >26’ | 24’ | 21’-1” | 25’-9” | 22’-4” | |
24 | 14’-6” | >26’ | 19’-6” | 17’-2” | 21’ | 18’-3” | |
2x14 | 12 | 23’ | >26’ | >26’ | >26’ | >26’ | >26’ |
16 | 19’-11” | >26’ | >26’ | 23’-7” | >26’ | 25’-1” | |
24 | 16’-3” | >26’ | 21’-10” | 19’-3” | 23’-7” | 20’-5” |
Please note that longer lengths of lumber, especially those over 20’ in length, may be hard to find. This table does not take that into account. Lengths over 26’ are not specified, as dimensional lumber is not sold in these lengths.